FREETOWN, (IRIN) – Shortly after her father died, Sia Bona’s husband’s family took over her father’s oil-palm plantation and rice paddies, and drove her and her mother from their home. “I came from riches, but now I am poor,” said the 45-year-old teacher from Koidu town in eastern Sierra Leone.
Like many African countries, Sierra Leone has a dual land tenure system, with aspects from the colonial era and customary ownership varying in proportion, depending on location. This creates confusion regarding land rights for women, says Catherine Gatundu, natural resource rights coordinator at NGO ActionAid International.
The 2007 Devolution of Estate Act criminalizes depriving a woman from inheriting her husband's property after his death. It recognizes customary marriage, the rights of polygamous spouses, and imposes penalties for evicting a spouse or child from the marital home.
The inheritance should be shared among surviving family, with 35 percent going to the spouse, 35 percent to the children, 15 percent to parents and 15 percent in line with any customary laws.
But the act only recognizes an individual’s right to land, not a family’s, and the vast majority of Sierra Leonean women live under traditional land tenure structures that do not recognize a woman’s right to own property.
While statutory law governs the capital, Freetown, and its surroundings, customary law – under the heads of ruling families known as paramount chiefs – governs the provinces. Paramount chiefs, the “custodians of the land”, are generally men and most ethnic groups do not allow women to inherit land and property.
Customary law applies in 12 of Sierra Leone’s 14 districts.
As the government looks to reform land policy ahead of presidential elections in November, gender activists are pushing to make women’s right to land a reality, calling the current set-up “discriminatory”.
“The land tenure system in the rural areas actually affects women the most,” said Gladys Brima, the founder of Women's Partnership for Justice and Peace, a local non-profit organization. “Women use the land more. But when it comes to ownership, women do not own the land.”
According to the US State Department’s 2011 Investment Climate Statement, agriculture accounts for over half of Sierra Leone’s income, up to 80 percent of the country’s agricultural workforce are women, and women farmers directly affect 40 percent of the national revenue.
In Sierra Leone, more than 20 percent of households are headed by women, and in over a third of these cases this is due to the death of her husband according to a 2011 food security study by the World Food Programme. Sierra Leone’s conflict was set off in part due to highly unequal distribution of natural resources, including land. During the war, which ended in 2002, two thirds of the population was displaced, and those who returned home often found their farmlands destroyed or occupied.
Musa Tamba Sam, Member of Parliament for the remote Kailahun district bordering Liberia, believes the 2007 Devolution of Estate Act is a step in the right direction. “[It] came about because women were marginalized in terms of property. The culture considered the woman as property, and she is amongst the things shared out by the family.”
The situation of most rural women has changed little, if at all. “It’s still not really possible for a woman in the rural areas to be a landowner,” said Sam.
The Act is often ignored by paramount chiefs, or not recognized by relatives who stand to gain under customary law, and in many areas and instances it is overridden by traditional laws for community land. The belief that land exists for the dead, the living and the unborn, and so cannot be permanently alienated is still strongly held in many areas.
According to a study led by the Italian non-profit, Cooperazione Internazionale (COOPI), three-quarters of land in the areas they surveyed was either family or communal property.
Actionaid’s Gatundu noted that practice tends to follow customary over statutory law even in countries that have included women’s land rights in their national constitution.
As a result of losing their land, many women and their families are pushed into hunger, children drop out of school, and families are forced to live on the street according to a COOPI study in 2012. Others must marry one of their husband’s male relatives to survive.
“Women use the majority of their earnings to pay for school fees, medical bills and other basic family needs,” said Roisin Cavanagh, manager of the Women’s Property and Land Rights project at COOPI. “So if women have insecure tenure, it means this income is at risk if their relationship with the man breaks down or he dies.”
Winning women’s votes
Separate to the Act, the government is also working on reforming current land policy, which will direct all future land legislation. Many women’s rights activists are disappointed with it, saying it does little to protect women’s rights to land and women were not properly consulted.
Sierra Leone’s 1991 constitution states that all persons are equal under the law, “unless customary law says otherwise”. In 2007 the country’s Constitutional Review Commission recommended that this section be abolished, but constitutional reform has yet to come. “It doesn’t matter how good the land policy is, [if this clause is not removed, nothing will change],” said Brima.
“At the moment the discourse on land in Sierra Leone is very much in the private space,” said COOPI’s Cavanagh. “People talk about land as a private issue, so it’s around the family… but it needs to be moved from the private sphere to the human rights sphere.”
In June 2012, COOPI and the United Nation’s Development Programme (UNDP)led the first national conference on women and land, bringing together women from across the country, activists, government and NGOs. Cavanagh hopes the conference will spark a countrywide women’s land rights movement.
Brima says now is a good time to open a national debate on land ownership, and hopes politicians will begin to see women as an important constituency ahead of general elections later this year. She noted that “This could be an easy win for politicians seeking to win the female vote.”